|
|
Post by abnormous on Sept 11, 2013 1:28:44 GMT
GM allowed me to experiment with stats as long as I posted results so here they are. 17 con and 18 con have the same results so here is the pic of HP with 17 con. LinC0003.bmp (937.55 KB) This is with 18 con start and 1 con added at lvl 51. Looks to have given a bit to make it worth the stat use. LinC0004.bmp (937.55 KB) |
|
|
|
Post by BabyZOMBIEsports on Sept 11, 2013 11:38:19 GMT
Can you please clarify this for me? I'm a bit slow this morning.
First Screenshot: level 75 DK with 17 con base at 1282 HP...but why does it show 18 con?
Second Screenshot: level 75 DK 18 con base +1 at 51 (for 19 con) at 1389 HP .... But why does it show 18 con (and not 19 as you said?)
Where is the screenshot of the level 75 18 con base DK? Thanks for the clarification!
Edit: I think it be interesting to see further CON tests as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by abnormous on Sept 11, 2013 22:57:55 GMT
I do not have DK with 18 con but GM confirmed 17 and 18 con have the same HP. I am not sure why the second pic is not showing 19 con as you say it only shows 18. I see 19 con.
I did do at the start a 18 con base DK, then added 5 con elixers at lvl 51 and an extra stat to con at 51 having 24 con total. From lvl 51 and up it did not show a large improvement like a few other servers. It seems as though 19 MIGHT be the cut off for any sort of bonus.
|
|
|
|
Post by BabyZOMBIEsports on Sept 12, 2013 11:00:08 GMT
Blech, is wish your testing was more thorough! The reason I say that is if in fact 17 or 19 con were optimal I would make some changes but because there's so many holes in your data and unconfirmed claims (ie 17 is same as 18 con) I can't make any tweaks based off this.
Not complaining, I realize you probably don't have infinite candles. Just wish we had conclusive evidence. All you have is that 19 is better than 17...nothing more, nothing less.
|
|
